🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an observance that was initiated as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include events where Black people are compensated to speak with predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The surge has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in February, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has evolved since those days, giving reduced attention to the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and more on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the celebration is celebrated is a reflection of the political moment. How it progresses is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how critical it is to rethink Black History Month better than the current time in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a elected representative feels empowered to state that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a source of worry. Simultaneously, far-right parties are growing in the EU as a complete entity.

In the US, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the country. A effort to scrub African American heritage and narrative from the archives is in progress. One of the former president's early administrative commands aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the celebration illustrates how minimally it can be impactful if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered festivities of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the conditions of the present. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is needed. An academic expert, a professor at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just discontinue things like Black History Month entirely, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an period that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an infrastructure that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not avoid politics, and leaves space for people, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is mere awareness of the past when it fails to address the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Establishments who celebrate it should not be pacified with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and awareness of “microaggressions”, but confronted with the risks that face all if anti-racism is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and reactive. Perhaps an total re-identification is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.